• 20Sep

    Posted by admin @ 2:22 pm

9 Responses

WP_Cloudy
  • Zesiro Says:
    Garnet is dead. Long live Garnet!
  • Chofa Says:
    Blah - blah - blah - blah, blah - blah - blah - blah, blah - blah - blah - blah.

    No one knows what the Google phone is like yet.

    The iPhone is a cute toy, just games and music and great web browser. No serious business tools at all and Apple stops all apps that are better than theirs, what a joke.

    Palm is info in and out quick. Palm WM is the best WM phones hands down.

    You seem to be clueless, do you need someone to make other decisions for you too.

  • Pahukumaa Says:
    Im still amazed that Palm OS 5 still kicks, when it comes to competing with Blackberries WMoblie and Apple, and now Google. It gets the job done.

    Internet "check"
    Video and Vid streaming "check"
    Office document editor "check"
    VOIP capability "check"
    EVDO 3g "check"
    Tether to laptop "check"
    GPS compatible (BT) "check"
    Music "check"
    Games "check"
    Able to VNC "check"
    Network with servers "check"
    Dates and appointments"check"
    3rd party compatible "check"
    Dmitry Hackable "check"

    I mean, what else could you do you want on a phone?

  • Ita Says:
    I can ignore blah blah blah by myself, thank you.

    I’m clearly aware that the iPhone doesn’t have any real software yet and also that it is tightly controlled. I’m also clearly aware of how much I still like the Palm OS, since I’m still using it. As far as the Google OS goes, it appears to me to have the chance to be much more open, have much more opportunity for data input, has just about everything built in (GPS, position sensing, and who knows what else, in addition to being apprently clean and fast even on old hardware) and thus should be very, very open to being usable, with the right programs and extensions, as a decent business device. Google, after all, is much more about building open platforms–certainly more open than anything by Apple or Sony, who are always ripe for the picking on said basis (I guess that should be past tense in the latter case…).

  • Turner Says:
    I don’t know if it will kill Palm OS, but it may provide the challenge that makes Palm take a real creative step forward after so long.

    I stumbled across the Android buzz late, looking for some PalmOS buzz to give me hope for a new phone (I’d been holding out, holding onto my lifedrive, but my phone is dying and I have to look at a smartphone for funcitonality in the world, and my lifedrive’s wifi access ..it’s too unreliable and I LOVED that terrible machine, still do, but …now it’s basically a game machine…that ain’t right).

    I am excited about what Android has to offer and I’m willing to give it a go.I’m ready to step forward and Palm’s not ready with something I want. So…

    I still love Palm, was looking at the Centro but the screen is just too small for me and its not on my network and I won’t be switching (I just got the kiddies phones on T-mo; the whole family is there), so…I’m gonna give this a shot and see how it goes.

    But I would love nothing more than for Palm to step out with something that totally blew up my skirt. C’mon Palm…show me somethin’!

  • Caitir Says:
    Sorry to BalBurgh, I regret typing that last sentence.

    Tired of reading all the posts about how POS is old and done for. It still does everything for me better and faster than all I have tried. No one has caught up to Palm for simple and fast.

    Most of the complaints, like no WiFi for their smartphone was not their doing, it was the carriers demands.

  • Musetta Says:
    @CMS - Java! I know the JVM but its really lousy and my dumbphone Nokia 6102i has a better VM. BUT, perhaps some bored programmer could pick up the ball that Palm dropped. Any takers?

    As for the rest of this discussion, competition always makes things better for us Googles new OS is adoptable to any handset maker, so hopefully we will start to see some standardization here. I feel sorry for mobile software developers that have to create 2000 versions of their apps for 2000 different handset platforms!

  • Idalia Says:
    I’m don’t care about trying to affix blame, but the "no WiFi/phone" combination is really an issue for me. I want a PDA I can surf the web on when I’m at home near my router, AND if I’m going to be dropping $300+, it better damn well be a phone too.

    I LOVE Palm, but it’s an issue.

    As far as blame, my understanding is that there’s a fundamental issue with why PalmOS can’t support both WiFi and Phone at the same time (single threaded OS maybe? I forget). But I’ve always suspected that carriers don’t want phones to have WiFi, cause that would prevent you from paying $$$ to surf on cellular signals.

  • Frida Says:
    I would be very happy to have wifi also. It is ridiculous for me to download a file for my Treo while reading these forums, then have to upload it to my ISP supplied online storage, ftp it to my 755p with RescoExplorer FTP copy, then delete the file from online storage from my computer! Yes, I could download direct to my phone from the forums, but I’m not going to open Blazer, go to the site, login, find the forum and message, blah blah… on that silly little 320×320 display. It was rough enough on my TX, but forget it on the treo. For me, Blazer is for emergencies and never casual surfing/reading.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.